VIRGINIA POLICY REVIEW
  • Home
  • About Us
  • The Third Rail
    • The Third Rail Editorial Board
  • Academical
    • Archived Podcast Episodes
  • National Journal Conference
  • Journal Submissions
  • Journal Issues

The Third Rail

An Online Publication of the Virginia Policy Review

A Delayed Confirmation Will Impact Key Supreme Court Decisions

3/29/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
By Kathleen Clark
         
Early this month, President Obama nominated Merrick Garland, Chief Judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, to the Supreme Court. This, of course, comes in response to the shocking death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who passed away in February at the age of 79 while on a trip in Texas. Chief Judge Garland’s nomination will be a hotly contested battle on Capitol Hill and his likely delayed confirmation offers yet another chance to both look back at what Justice Scalia accomplished as the longest-standing member of the court, and to highlight some of the potential outcomes in an eight person Supreme Court for the more contentious legal cases.

Antonin Scalia was sworn in to the Supreme Court in September 1986, during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. One of the most infamous members of the Supreme Court, he was a self-proclaimed “originalist,” preferring to interpret the Constitution through the lens of the original authors even when in direct opposition with his own preferences.  He was also known for his blunt, often controversial, statements, perhaps most recently noted in the Fisher v. University of Texas case heard by the Supreme Court on December 9, 2015.  While he certainly was, at times, a controversial figure during his tenure on the Court, there is no doubt of his influence as a justice and his dedication to redefining the way policymakers read the Constitution and consider the role of the Supreme Court as U.S. policy continues to progress into uncharted territory. Additionally, he was on record as the funniest of all the justices, creating the most documented audience laugher episodes in court transcripts of all the members of the Supreme Court.

Following several cases throughout the past year, which had more liberal-leaning outcomes, Scalia’s death and Garland’s delayed confirmation leaves the Court and the country in an interesting predicament. There are many key cases passing through the Supreme Court in the near future, many of which the conservatives expected to win. However, Scalia’s absence puts these wins in jeopardy. Additionally, now that the court has only eight members rather than its full-capacity nine, any 4-4 vote on a case will serve to uphold the ruling of the lower court. Here are some of the cases the media and political community believe will be most affected.
  •  Labor Unions: The court heard Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association in January, and Scalia was the expected swing vote. The case, which will determine whether or not non-union members must pay “fair share fees” to unions for the cost of collective bargaining, will now likely end with a 4-4- vote, affirming the previous decision in support of these fair share fees.
  • Affirmative Action: The court heard Fisher v. University of Texas in December, and Scalia was a strong voice during oral arguments against the University of Texas. However, it is believed that the decision could still go in the conservative side’s favor against Affirmative Action, as more liberal Justice Elena Kagan is recused.
  • Abortion: Another Texas case, Whole Woman’s Health v. Cole, will be heard in early March. In the most significant abortion case of the 21st century so far, the court will decide whether or not to uphold Texas’s laws that close or greatly restrict abortion providers and clinics. Unless Justice Anthony Kennedy becomes a swing vote, the case will now most likely end in a 4-4 vote affirming the lower courts decision in favor of the laws.
  • Contraception: The Zubik v. Burwell case, to be heard in March, will determine whether or not religious nonprofits, such as charities, schools, and hospitals, must abide by the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate, which requires them to provide birth control access through health insurance. Without Scalia, the conservative side must try to prevent a 4-4 ruling that would uphold the lower court’s ruling in favor of the mandate. 
 
While President Obama has his nominee, Chief Justice Garland’s confirmation is not a guarantee. The battle is only beginning on both sides of aisle to gain control of one of the most powerful positions in the United States today. Republicans appear to be sticking to their position to block any nominee presented by the President until after the election, while President Obama and several Democrats have called for a quick confirmation of Garland. One thing, however, is certain: Scalia’s death couldn’t have come at a more important time.



is a 2017 MPP candidate at the University of Virginia Frank Batten School of Leadership and Public Policy. She serves as a Staff Writer for the Third Rail blog.

0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Categories

    All
    Domestic
    Economics
    Education
    Electoral Politics
    Environment
    Gun Rights
    Health
    International
    Justice
    Law
    Politics
    Social
    Urban

    Archives

    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    October 2018
    September 2018
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014

ADDRESS

Virginia Policy Review
235 McCormick Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22904

EMAIL

​virginiapolicyreview@gmail.com

SOCIAL MEDIA

  • Home
  • About Us
  • The Third Rail
    • The Third Rail Editorial Board
  • Academical
    • Archived Podcast Episodes
  • National Journal Conference
  • Journal Submissions
  • Journal Issues